Leading, Slipping, Gaining, Lagging Analysis:
Assessing Administrative and Waste Services Employment Growth
Across Iowa Counties
Administrative and Waste Services
Employment Growth
County vs Statewide Average: 2010-2022 and 2022
Administrative and Waste Services
Employment Growth
Iowa:
2010-2022 = 0.38%
2022 = 2.33%
Borrowing from an approach that sometimes appears in the finance sections of the popular press, LSGL analysis is a handy and versatile way to compare, portray and classify the patterns of administrative and waste services employment growth across all of Iowa's 99 counties. In finance, this technique is used for comparing and assessing the market performance of individual securities or across industry sectors. For example, the performance of the 30 stocks contained within Dow are compared with one another over the past week in contrast to their performance over the past month using the Dow's respective averages as the points of reference.
Here in this Iowa Regional Economic Analysis Project report, we adopt this approach to gauge and compare the administrative and waste services employment growth of Iowa's 99 counties over the latest available year (2022) against the backdrop of their growth over the long term period (2010-2022). In so doing we classify their growth and performance into 4 broad categories: Leading, Slipping, Gaining and Lagging.
Administrative and Waste Services
Employment Growth
County vs Statewide Average: 2010-2022 and 2022
Administrative and Waste Services
Employment Growth
Iowa:
2010-2022 = 0.38%
2022 = 2.33%
This figure displays the 99 counties of Iowa as dots on a scattergram, with the vertical axis representing the average annual administrative and waste services employment growth rate over the long-term period (2010-2022), and the horizontal axis representing the administrative and waste services employment growth rate for the near-term (2022).
This figure sets apart those counties whose long-term administrative and waste services employment growth exceeded the statewide average of 0.38%, by portraying them in the top two quadrants demarcated at 0.38% on the vertical axis. County whose long-term average annual administrative and waste services employment growth rate trailed the statewide average (0.38%) are distributed in the bottom two quadrants. In all, 18 counties surpassed the statewide average over 2010-2022, while 16 counties fell below.
Similarly, the two quadrants on the right of this figure present the positions of the 14 counties whose most recent (2022) administrative and waste services employment growth rate exceeded the statewide average (2.33%). The two quadrants on the left feature those 20 counties whose administrative and waste services employment growth over 2022 trailed the statewide average.
Accordingly, each quadrant portrays the performance of all 99 counties corresponding with their long-term (2010-2022) and near-term (2022) performance relative to their respective statewide averages of 0.38% over 2010-2022 and 2.33% over 2022:
Leading counties () (top-right quadrant)...are counties whose average annual administrative and waste services employment growth rate surpassed the statewide average both long-term (0.38%) and near-term (2.33%).
Slipping counties () (top-left quadrant)...are counties whose long-term average annual administrative and waste services employment growth rate exceeded the statewide average (0.38%), but whose near-term growth has "slipped" by falling below the Iowa average (2.33%).
Gaining counties () (bottom-right quadrant)...are counties whose long-term average annual administrative and waste services employment growth rate fell below the statewide average (0.38%), but whose near-term growth has "gained" by registering above the average (2.33%) statewide.
Lagging counties () (bottom-left quadrant)...are counties whose average annual administrative and waste services employment growth rate fell under the statewide average both long-term (0.38%) and near-term (2.33%).
   
 
Summary of Iowa's 99 County Totals
 
Short Term Average
 
 
Below
(2.33%)
Above
(2.33%)
 
Long
Term
Average
Above
(0.38%)
9
9
18
Below
(0.38%)
11
5
16
 
20
14
34
 
   
Leading Counties
2022 vs. 2010-2022 Averages
Leading Counties
white dot
Iowa:
2010-2022 = 0.38%
2022 = 2.33%
Turning attention to the top-right quadrant from the discussion above, this figure features the distribution of the Iowa counties classified as Leading. These counties surpassed Iowa's average annual administrative and waste services employment growth both long-term (2010-2022 = 0.38%) as well as near-term (2022 = 2.33%). Each is identified by its corresponding ranking based on it's average annual administrative and waste services employment growth rate over 2010-2022.
Of Iowa's 99 counties, just 9 (9%) are classified within the Leading () category. Those counties ranked by their long-term average include:
Slipping Counties
2022 vs. 2010-2022 Averages
Slipping Counties
Iowa:
2010-2022 = 0.38%
2022 = 2.33%
This figure depicts the distribution of the 9 Iowa counties classified as Slipping (top-left quadrant), in that their long-term average annual administrative and waste services employment growth rate outpaced the average statewide (2010-2022 = 0.38%), while they trailed the statewide average near-term (2022 = 2.33%). Again, each county is identified by it's corresponding ranking based on its average annual administrative and waste services employment growth rate over 2010-2022.
Only 9 (9%) of Iowa's 99 counties are classified as Slipping (). Those counties ranked by their long-term average include:
Gaining Counties
2022 vs. 2010-2022 Averages
Gaining Counties
white dot
Iowa:
2010-2022 = 0.38%
2022 = 2.33%
This figure shows the distribution of the 5 Iowa counties classified as Gaining (bottom-right quadrant), in that their long-term average annual administrative and waste services employment growth rate posted below the average statewide (2010-2022 = 0.38%), while they outpaced Iowa's average near-term (2022 = 2.33%). Again, each county is identified by its corresponding ranking based on its average annual administrative and waste services employment growth rate over 2010-2022.
Of Iowa's 99 counties, only 5% (5) are featured as Gaining (). Those counties ranked by their long-term average include:
Lagging Counties
2022 vs. 2010-2022 Averages
Lagging Counties
white dot
Iowa:
2010-2022 = 0.38%
2022 = 2.33%
This figure depicts the distributions of the 11 Iowa counties classified as Lagging (bottom-left quadrant). These counties trailed the statewide average annual administrative and waste services employment growth both long-term (2010-2022 = 0.38%) as well as near-term (2022 = 2.33%). Again, each county is identified by its corresponding ranking based on it's average annual administrative and waste services employment growth rate over 2010-2022.
11% of Iowa's counties, 11 of 99, are characterized here as Lagging (). Those counties ranked by their long-term average include:
   
 
Iowa
Administrative and Waste Services Employment Growth
County vs. Statewide Average
 
2010-2022
 
2022
 
 
Leading Counties
 
18
0.45
 
22
4.83
3,862
 
11
1.42
 
5
22.12
1,176
 
1
10.87
 
2
33.60
1,690
 
13
1.23
 
19
6.15
449
 
16
0.80
 
27
4.01
285
 
7
2.21
 
15
7.51
315
 
10
1.54
 
7
14.82
2,649
 
12
1.35
 
18
6.80
2,449
 
5
2.97
 
24
4.28
779
Slipping Counties
 
2
9.64
 
66
-9.37
3,019
 
14
1.09
 
35
1.69
2,461
 
6
2.58
 
62
-6.78
165
 
17
0.58
 
40
0.00
399
 
4
3.05
 
49
-2.35
1,868
 
8
2.16
 
44
-0.37
267
 
3
4.58
 
37
1.40
362
 
9
1.57
 
67
-9.90
819
 
15
1.01
 
36
1.41
789
Gaining Counties
 
31
-1.81
 
25
4.20
397
 
28
-1.46
 
17
6.93
108
 
24
-0.63
 
3
26.21
260
 
19
0.29
 
26
4.15
22,185
 
33
-2.34
 
33
2.51
204
Lagging Counties
 
21
0.20
 
64
-9.11
1,437
 
30
-1.69
 
54
-3.35
404
 
34
-2.98
 
58
-4.66
1,228
 
22
-0.33
 
52
-2.93
3,218
 
27
-1.42
 
69
-15.02
758
 
20
0.25
 
42
-0.11
9,017
 
32
-2.01
 
39
1.09
185
 
25
-0.73
 
51
-2.75
813
 
23
-0.55
 
55
-3.42
395
 
29
-1.56
 
34
1.77
6,037
 
26
-0.89
 
47
-2.02
4,177
Undefined/Suppressed Counties
 
U
U
 
57
-4.12
186
 
U
U
 
S
S
16
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
30
2.97
208
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
323
 
U
U
 
29
3.49
504
 
U
U
 
59
-4.70
284
 
U
U
 
56
-3.73
284
 
U
U
 
60
-4.87
410
 
U
U
 
4
23.95
295
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
6
19.76
303
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
63
-8.77
104
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
265
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
40
0.00
232
 
U
U
 
1
34.46
199
 
U
U
 
10
12.57
188
 
U
U
 
20
5.85
199
 
U
U
 
53
-3.23
210
 
U
U
 
31
2.90
213
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
65
-9.30
195
 
U
U
 
14
8.33
416
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
68
-10.14
124
 
U
U
 
28
3.87
376
 
U
U
 
46
-1.84
213
 
U
U
 
S
S
575
 
U
U
 
13
9.09
192
 
U
U
 
11
11.36
98
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
21
5.56
57
 
U
U
 
S
S
137
 
U
U
 
S
S
286
 
U
U
 
45
-0.64
625
 
U
U
 
8
13.48
303
 
U
U
 
50
-2.53
193
 
U
U
 
12
10.53
126
 
U
U
 
48
-2.04
144
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
61
-5.00
95
 
U
U
 
32
2.55
564
 
U
U
 
9
12.96
61
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
16
7.41
739
 
U
U
 
S
S
79
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
23
4.60
341
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
149
 
U
U
 
43
-0.31
634
 
U
U
 
38
1.18
86
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
0.38
 
2.33
88,801
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2.04
 
4.49
13,058,300
November 2023
REAP_PI_CA1500N_511400_LSGL
 
   
Analysis Options Menu
Select Year Interval
to
Select Alternative Industry
Highlight a Region (Optional)
Copyright © 2024. Pacific Northwest Regional Economic Analysis Project (PNREAP). All Rights Reserved.

Please stay tuned...
while your request is processing:

Please wait while your request is being processed...
To offer the most comprehensive set of interactive options in support of your research, IA-REAP calculates and crunches most of the data and generates the narrative and graphic analysis on demand in response to your request.
Your request will soon be available.
Just a few more seconds....Your request has been generated and is now loading the results.